Female veterans and service members are speaking out against comments made by Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for defense secretary, who stated that women should not be in combat roles. Hegseth suggested that women are not as capable as men in these positions and that their presence complicates fighting efforts. However, many female veterans have expressed their readiness to take on combat roles, citing their training and dedication to serving their country.
The Pentagon opened combat roles to women in 2016, allowing them to serve in special operations units and infantry positions previously unavailable to them. Despite this progress, Hegseth’s comments are concerning to many female veterans, who argue that they have proven their competence and heroism in combat situations during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
Critics of Hegseth’s views, such as Iraq War veteran Allison Jaslow and retired Army Lt. Col. Raquel Durden, believe that women are already serving effectively in combat roles and should be judged based on their individual capabilities rather than being subject to a blanket ban on combat jobs. Senator Tammy Duckworth, a Purple Heart recipient, has also condemned Hegseth’s stance, stating that he is out of touch with the reality of modern warfare.
Hegseth’s nomination is controversial, especially in light of allegations of sexual assault against him in 2017. Critics argue that he is not a suitable candidate for defense secretary, given his comments on women in combat roles and the accusations against him. The issue of women serving in combat roles remains a contentious topic within the military, with many female veterans advocating for equality and recognition of their contributions to the armed forces.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com
