The New Hampshire Bulletin reported that state regulators decided against tracking police employment history despite being tasked with the job. The decision was made citing cost concerns. The decision brings into question the state’s ability to provide transparency and accountability in law enforcement.
The issue arose when the state’s Police Standards and Training Council asked the Department of Safety to develop a system to track police employment history. The purpose of this system was to prevent officers with a history of misconduct from being hired by other police departments. However, regulators ultimately decided that the cost of developing and maintaining such a system would be too high.
Critics argue that without a comprehensive system in place to track police employment history, there is a risk that officers with a history of misconduct could slip through the cracks and continue to work in law enforcement. This lack of transparency could also erode public trust in the police force.
The decision highlights the ongoing challenges in ensuring accountability and transparency in law enforcement. Advocates for police reform have long called for better tracking of officer misconduct and employment history to prevent officers with a history of misconduct from moving to different departments.
While regulators may have decided against tracking police employment history due to cost concerns, the issue of accountability and transparency in law enforcement remains a pressing concern for many in New Hampshire. The decision raises questions about the state’s commitment to ensuring the integrity of its police force and protecting the public from officers with a history of misconduct.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com