In a recent opinion piece for The Union Leader, Bill Ohm argues that if Nashua were to allow casinos in order to generate revenue, the city should also receive a portion of the profits. Ohm believes that Nashua would face the negative impacts of gambling, such as increased crime and addiction, and therefore should be compensated for these consequences.
Ohm points out that other states with casinos have implemented revenue sharing agreements with local municipalities to help offset the social costs incurred. He argues that Nashua should follow suit and negotiate a fair deal that would provide funding for addiction treatment programs, mental health services, and law enforcement to address the potential repercussions of having a casino in the city.
The author emphasizes that Nashua should not simply rely on the promise of increased revenue from a casino, as the costs associated with mitigating the negative effects of gambling could outweigh the financial benefits. He suggests that the city should advocate for a percentage of the casino’s revenue to be allocated directly to Nashua, ensuring that the community is adequately compensated for bearing the burden of hosting a gambling establishment.
Overall, Ohm stresses the importance of considering the long-term implications of introducing casinos to Nashua and urges city officials to prioritize the well-being of residents by securing a fair share of the profits. By advocating for a revenue sharing agreement, Nashua can better prepare for and address the potential challenges that come with the presence of a casino in the area.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com
